The operational problem
Each clinic serves a different local patient and search context while sharing a broader practice brand and regulated content needs.
Location-specific patient information and appointment paths for Greely, Vanier, and Walkley.
Why this system exists
Location-specific sites answer practical patient questions without forcing every clinic into one generic page or duplicating ungoverned content across unrelated implementations.
Three repositories serve one multi-location practice. Their configured public domains were not reachable during this audit, so the portfolio uses existing approved captures and does not promote an unverified live link.
How the work moves
- Confirm location facts
- Map patient questions
- Build service and appointment paths
- Apply responsive system
- Validate regulated claims
- Maintain local content
What shaped the solution
Configured public domains were not reachable during this audit.
Clinical claims and photography ownership cannot be attributed to Ayub.
What I owned
Designed
Location-specific patient and conversion paths within a shared brand context
Developed
Greely, Vanier, and Walkley responsive website codebases
Tested
Mobile layouts, content claims, routes, and appointment journeys
Collaborated
Practice stakeholders and location-specific sources
Decisions that carried the work
Keep location truth local
Each site carries its own clinic facts and patient paths instead of relying on one generic practice page.
Verified outcome
Separate Greely, Vanier, and Walkley codebases with service, contact, and patient-information surfaces.
Desktop and mobile client captures exist.
What I will not overclaim
The portfolio uses approved prior captures and does not promote an unverified live deployment.
Verified from the Greely, Vanier, and Walkley repositories, project briefs, and existing captures.